MOODY's
HELPS MODI?
An article in a web
magazine called COUNTERVIEW today has an
article that says the higher Sovereign rating given to India by the
international credit rating agency Moody’s and the earlier good reports by the
World Bank and IMF are as a result of Modi's top Gujarat babus in PMO
lobbying with Washington institutes,
quoting an un-namd “ Insider”. the ‘Counterview’ article is yet more proof that
left-wingers who struggle with economics and basic analytics have to now rely
on low-grade gossips and that facts are never an obstacle when they still try
to advance a certain “required” narrative.A credit rating is a measure of the credit worthiness of a borrowing entity, whether a sovereign or a company. It is a tag that tells a potential lender how likely it is that the borrower will default on payments. I am no financial expert but I suppose India’s credit rating going up by one notch to Baa2 from the earlier Baa3, simply indicates that the rating agency believes India’s credit worthiness has improved since it last conducted a review. (China’s rating was also downgraded earlier this year to A1 from Aa3, citing risks from soaring debts. Russia is at Ba1 among BRICS countries) It will mean a lowering of the risk premium that India will have to pay; and that means India can now command a lower interest rate for the debt that it issues. If you had watched the investment climate in the country during the last year, you would have seen FIIs making more investments in debts than equities thanks to the better interest rates following lower inflation. This trend will possibly be reversed now. That is no earth-shaking news, for the Opposition politicians to cry foul! When people are upset about someone says something nice about our country, it shows up the protestor’s complete alienation!
It is known that international
monetary and financial systems like the World Bank and the IMF routinely
monitor the economic and financial policies of member countries. This activity
is known as surveillance and facilitates international co-operation. The
responsibilities of IMF and World Bank had changed for many years from those of
guardian to those of overseer of members’ policies. Their reports and the
ratings help capital markets and credit risk management professionals worldwide
to respond to an evolving global marketplace with confidence. There may be
lobbying of sorts to project the policy perspectives of the countries to
encourage better understanding by their Boards of Directors so that the image
of the countries is not tarnished if not enhance. Indian (Modi) government too
has the right to be heard with respect and minus the usual intellectual
condescension. The writer thinks that some top bureaucrats from the Gujarat
cadre, currently in the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) must have lobbied with World
Bank, Moody's and Pew, for ensuring a sharp image makeover of Modi ahead of the
Gujarat elections because last year these bodies didn’t show India under Modi
in good light is being irresponsible to the level of an unthinking rage and
hatred for the Modi Government. Has the author heard Keynes’ comment “When
facts change I change my opinions. What do you do?”
“An insider in
Gujarat government told me” seems to be the ultimate political kryptonite this
author could produce! It will be another damp squib, I assure you! Since the
run-up to the general election of 2014, we are witnessing a growing gulf
between what the electorate thinks and how a small intellectual elite in India
as well as abroad perceive happenings in India! We saw how little the coloured
reports by a small coterie of agenda-driven journalists influenced the outcome
in UP or in the various municipal and local bodies elections in different
States! I will not be surprised if the outcome of the Himachal and Gujarat
elections aren’t different! Perhaps it is that fear which makes some Opposition
leaders and journalists make a hue and cry about Moody’s higher Sovereign rating
for India. Next in line will be better ratings for Indian Companies. Moody's have
revised outlook for three Indian public sector banks to stable from negative,
and appreciated the capital infusion plan for the PSU banks is a significant
credit positive for them public Moody's. Outlook for Indian banking system was stable
in August 2017.
I think the higher
rating puts Modi Government in a “watched-pot situation” for making calculated
and calibrated steps forward to implement fiscal, financial, land and labour market
reforms in the days ahead. Moody’s one-notch rating upgrade is a bet that India
will contain public debt. The upgrade is a recognition of the fact that India
continues to follow a path of fiscal prudence. Moody’s acknowledge that many a
Modi reform remain at the design phase, while believing that those implemented
to date will advance the government’s objective of improving the business
climate, enhancing productivity, stimulating foreign and domestic investment,
and ultimately fostering strong and sustainable growth. Government alone cannot
achieve much. The people, including those in the Opposition camps too have a
role in development efforts of the regime. It is here that the expression “power
paradox” comes to my mind: a situation where political dominance can,
paradoxically, reduce the ruling party’s actual power to shape and guide
society and economy! It is sad because here is a PM who inaugurated a great
unburdening on issues of religious and caste differences and regional politics
with an agenda for development of all, treated as an enemy of the people! There
appears to be a new thought process and propagation of it in the Opposition
ranks in which reason dies, ideas go unchallenged and become axiomatic and
eventually beliefs!
The sure sign of the
death of reason and even discretion and intelligence is the flood of
obscenities flowing into the Facebook page of the hapless Australian Cricketer Tom Moody, for helping Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi with a higher credit rating for India!
No comments:
Post a Comment