Saturday, July 30, 2016

To the sympathisers of ‘Kashmiriyat’
The idea of “root causes” has had great sociological, political and journalistic attraction. It is argued that the Government of India has to hope in the conflict areas of the North East, Punjab (when it was in turmoil) and of course in Jammu and Kashmir for a non-military solution as the real causes of the insurrections were lack of employment, which was caused by the Administrations’ indifference to serious development issues. The notion that poverty causes ferment and terrorism has been discredited so often and for so long after thorough research. If lack of employment for the youth were the cause of radicalization, there would be revolutions everywhere and always! Unemployment and poverty in general is a common condition of mankind in many countries in the world. 

Why then the radicalization is neither ubiquitous nor rampant as the believers of the “root causes syndrome” would like. The presence of something more sinister has to be there to explain why there are upsurges, revolts and revolution-seeking in some places and not others. This forces reasonable people (who, of course, do not make a living out of such phenomena!) out of the realm of root causes to culture, history, leadership, sponsorship and other contingent causes. In the case of the North East, the study was done; so also in the case of Punjab. In both these sectors, though they are in hostile neighborhood, the radicalization and gun-culture are on the wane substantially following the analysis and action, including use of force!

In Kashmir the “root cause” was known to all, but for reasons of a perverse policy emanating from a wretched ideology, the wound was allowed to fester for almost seven decades! The fundamental fact known to the Government India is that those who engage in violence and terror in the Kashmir valley do not want peace. They want secession of the piece of land in the name of the religion of the majority population; and to facilitate the possibility thet drove away the minority! Their leaders are fanatic Mullahs and politicians across the border. Those who sympathize with their cause have a responsibility to suggest a solution, not any “compromise formula”!

The Governments of the land, both Central and the Sate of J&K are doing everything imaginable to restrain terrorism such as political, administrative, economic and military means. To expect after decades of passivity and half-measures, Modi Government can put to a permanent end to turmoil in Kashmir valley is absurd.

Remember, there are wo/men around in the same cause who take guns on planes, bomb restaurants, behead people with hatchets; with richer, more powerful, more organised, and more technologically advanced, countries being subjected to their “revolutionary” ways now. Terrorism is therefore considered by a sympathetic media as an appropriate technology for the welfare of the oppressed and the weak!

I say this to them: people don’t choose to move around cutting throats, enslaving women, immolating people in cages, crucifying them, and burying children alive because they are struggling to make ends meet or because their job applications aren’t getting them callbacks. They do it because they are fervent believers in a medieval warrior ideology that feeds their bloodlust and justifies it. They weil nevr tolerate "others". They want their 'Ummah"with only their people living along. Somebody else has said it. I am saying that once again!

Kashmir is known to have got it’s name from Kashyapa Muni. The ancient Greeks called it "Kasperia," and the Chinese pilgrim Hiun-Tsang who visited the place(7th century AD) called it "Kashimilo." Kalhana, the Kashmiri who wrote Rajatarangini in Sanskrit (River of Kings) during 1148 and 1149. Gives an account of the history of Kashmir. In the 3rd century BC, emperor Ashoka introduced Buddhism in the valley. Kashmir became a major hub of Hindu culture by the 9th century AD. It was the birthplace of Kashmiri 'Shaivism'. Kashmir is mentioned by Sanskrit grammarian Panini's (500 B.C.), Varahmihra (C.A.D. 500), in his Brahtsamhita, includes the Kashmiras in the north-eastern division of the other tribes who lived in this region. Hindu kings ruled the land until 1346, when Muslim invaders came on the scene. So the legitimacy of the India in Kashmir rests on the 3,000-year established connection of the people with Bharat Varsha and the Hindu culture. Unfortunately, it is in the context of all factions of radical Islam denying the concept of nationalism, and believes in reviving the Islamic nation as a single political entity governed by Islamic law that we have to look at the Kashmir issue. Kashmiriyat is an illiberal shibboleth liberals have suddenly fallen in love with. It is a bogus phenomenon, it is sacrilegious against Indian democracy; it is        a charade, a farce, a travesty, a pretence, a masquerade! The Indian State and the Indian people do not accept it!
Kerala opts for helmets!

It is nice to see media reports in Kerala supporting the helmet rule! Earlier every report of a fatal accident in the State's media used to conclude"the victim had worn helmet/seat-belt" in a deliberate attempt to run down the socio-medical/statutory campaign to make those implements compulsory for motoring public! There were numerous articles, and references on audio-visual media about the inconvenience aspect, the "unscientific" aspect (a favourite term in Kerala!) and about the uselessness of the helmet and seat-belt to the  extent that when the great actor Jagathy Shreekumar was incapacitated in a terrible road accident, his daughter gave an interview (there mus have been several?) in which she alleged that the seat-belt he wore was responsible for breaking his neck! No one from the medical profession in Kerala bothered to remove that piece of nonsense from public domain with the factual state of affairs!

I congratulate ADGP Tomin Thachankary for the bold decision and also the his bosses for not thwarting him!
     VS as saviour of Media!
    
     Anyone who had followed V S Achuthanandan's political career would know he was a product of a media relationship he "cultivated"! Pinarayi, the Kerala Stalin was never very pleasant to deal with even to the party cadre, (not to speak of the media!) with an uppishness that suited jhis Stalinist credentials! It is a sad thing to see the media carting around this ancient and unschooled "radical" who wheels out some of the most stupid myths of the Left! By this the State's media is allowing the Left to continue drawing a wildly and destructively inaccurate portrait of Keralites as a people and to dominate our imaginations and debase our thinking. The BJP appears happy that VS took the name of Kummanam to humiliate Pinarayi, saying that the BJP State President’s petition against the appointment as the legal advisor in the High Court had persuaded M K Damodaran to resign, forgetting that VS taps for toddy and palm sugar alternatively!   

     VS as saviour of Media!
    
     Anyone who had followed V S Achuthanandan's political career would know he was a product of a media relationship he "cultivated"! Pinarayi, the Kerala Stalin was never very pleasant to deal with even to the party cadre, (not to speak of the media!) with an uppishness that suited jhis Stalinist credentials! It is a sad thing to see the media carting around this ancient and unschooled "radical" who wheels out some of the most stupid myths of the Left! By this the State's media is allowing the Left to continue drawing a wildly and destructively inaccurate portrait of Keralites as a people and to dominate our imaginations and debase our thinking. The BJP appears happy that VS took the name of Kummanam to humiliate Pinarayi, saying that the BJP State President’s petition against the appointment as the legal advisor in the High Court had persuaded M K Damodaran to resign, forgetting that VS taps for toddy and palm sugar alternatively!   

Sunday, May 8, 2016

Before and after a rape
Malini Nair of the Times Group, in an Op-ed article, Story Behind the Rape in ToI on 6th May, 2016 contends that the traditional “adakkavum othukkavum” (which she conveniently, “loosely” translates as control and docility ) introduced to the girlhood by the family patriarchs in Kerala society as acceptable behavior pattern for women, is responsible for Kerala women’s basic tendency to acquiesce, accept and not to rebel or question.

The ridiculous part of the argument is that she cites her discovery as the reason for the innumerable cases of rapes, assaults against the women, sexual harassment, and cruelty by husbands that she quotes from the NCRB statistics of the past one decade! I have lived a major part of my life in Kerala and raised a daughter there; so have my brothers and sisters. “Adakkavum othukkavum” in the familial parlance was never what Malini Nair understands.  I am sure, she knows what it is, but fakes the understanding to get a point of view validated: that patriarchal families forced girl children to imbibe certain traditional values she opposes for whatever reasons, and alleges that those values wanted a “polite society” she finds hateful, being an argumentative and spirited woman herself or is the category she represents.)  

“Adakkavum othukkavum’ is a phrase meaning modesty, forebearance, self-control, humility, fortitude and stoicism” in a society that protected women “like the eyeball”. If one goes by Ms.Nair’s contention, the girls belonging to the new generation of “spirited” women, in the State considered also"gender empowered"(that is equal to men in areas of  political participation and decision making, economic participation and decision making, and power over economic resources) would not have suffered the fate enumerated by her! Jisha was an MA, and was doing her LLB. The only problem was that her family had no money, and no male members to keep a watch over her to see that no harm comes. Poor women have always been targeted, unless they had some other power to compensate for the lack of money: family, associations, employment, or direct political backing.  

A decade ago I had written a long blog (‘Sex and Keralites’) about the unacceptable sexual behavior of the Malayalee males. I had written in there that “Kerala’s major contribution in social life seems to be in giving the go to the element of consent and dragging innocent girls and women in vulnerable plights into the sordid world of sexual exploitation.” And also “People seem to flaunt their affection for not only the other sex, but for one’s own these days”....“Now incest is not the rarest phenomenon it was in Kerala. In fact no relationship seems to have any sanctity. Boys openly crack sexual jokes about their teachers’ wives. Sisters-in-law who used to be equivalent to mothers in olden times have also become desirable sexual objects these days. Friends’ mothers are no different.”

Ms.Nair is silent about what make boys and men behave as they do, and concentrates on why the women have to undergo the horrible experience all their lives. Why is it that any female between the age of six and sixty is unsafe on Kerala’s thoroughfares even in broad daylight, as late M.P.Narayana Pillai bemoaned? I believe, it is not because of the “adakkavum othukkavum” instilled in the girls from childhood, but on account of the breakdown of traditional mores, values, also of the fundamental moral views which were replaced by a modern one: “men and women are like he-goats and she goats; every normally constituted man wants to pop into bed with every normally constituted woman; and vice versa!”I am quoting from memory a character with a nickname ‘Subanovsky’ in a K A Abbas novel. Those who conducted ‘Chumban Samaram”(‘Kiss of Love’) were drawing other people’s sisters to join them in a fake protest, as an initiation process into a form of physical relationship starting from lips! And it was proven so, with some kingpin later being found to operate an online sex racket! The disgusting saga doesn’t end there...


Sunday, May 1, 2016

The USCIRF and its (Hindu)India-bashing
Tomorrow, May 2nd 2016, the U S Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) is scheduled to release its annual report. In the context of the ‘Hindu Nationalist Government’ of India denying visa to USCIRF recently, and the IB stating that USCIRF reports were based on “half-truths, hearsay and standalone cases,” I have a premonition regarding what is coming!

The US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) had in the past unleashed a torrent of invective directed at India, which in its strange wisdom, considers to be a country intolerant of religious minorities! The 2015 USCIRF Report was suffused with hypocrisy and double standards that the SundayGuardian editorially mocked it that were authors of it to ever get tasked to write a history of the subcontinent, they would affirm that it is not Pakistan but India where the share of minorities in the total population has fallen precipitously since 1947!

How do we counter portrayal of our country as a den of fanatics, with the ulterior motive of providing an excuse for the US administration to threaten sanctions and other punitive measures against India? The saddest part of it that the most active “informers” supplying the material against India are the evangelist Christian groups, particularly the CBCI! People who preach religious tolerance to India must ask themselves, does “respectful coexistence of diversity” mean that every Indian has to be a Christian to be SAVED and reach heaven or paradise or has to be either killed or converted to Islam, the one and only true faith?

Hindu Dharma, unlike Christianity and Islam doesn’t divide humanity into those chosen by God and those eternally damned. It requires regarding all as brothers and sisters! Not even the lunatic fringe among the Hindus, do not consider that India’s Constitutional promise of secularism, liberty, equality, and democracy to minorities was inappropriate, with the country’s huge diversity: half-a-dozen major religions, 14 official languages and hundreds of dialects, many scripts and literature. There is only an assertion about a common culture. Does that hurt the USCIRF to know that an 80+percent majority in India embrace the rest as brothers and sisters under an overlapping cultural umbrella; that the mother society feels for the children who have taken up different faiths for whatever reasons? Why is the USCIRF so mystifyingly blind as not to see that  the 3% Christians and the 14% or so Muslims in India, live as full citizens in political, social, cultural and the religious life of India, and  enjoy greater rights and freedoms in than any similar minorities in any other country including the United States?

But of course, the USCIRF cannot keep ordering India for a grovelling “outreach” to extremist Muslims and Christians! Hindus have been happy to live their lives without bothering about Faiths of others. Why are Christians, Muslims (and atheists too) waging war on beliefs that mean nothing to them Well, if it comes to a confrontation that USCIRF is attempting, why can’t we Hindus insist and maintain that we reject all religions that do not agree with Indian thought and values? Muslims attempt to wall off outside influences, permitting only an Islamic education for their children and disengaging from the wider non-Muslim community everywhere. Christians believe that Jesus said “"I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me” and "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me..."If you had known Me, you would have known My Father also; from now on you know Him, and have seen Him." Isn’t that denying those who do not become Christians access to God?

And what do the HINDUS believe: They hold on to the Upanishadic philosophy "Ekam sat vipra bahudha vadanti" —"that which exists is One (God): sages call it by various names! Is there a more inclusive philosophy? The moderation of the majority, has ensured the safety of the minority, and those who ignore this fact are diverting attention from countries where religious persecution is the norm!

Other than the USCIR, the U.S. State Department too has its annual International Religious Freedom report, a country-by-country catalogue of the treatment of religious groups around the globe! It is actually international policing! How many of us remember enormous kleptocracy named the UPA, remote-controlled by an Italian Catholic lady, had made the unprecedented step of inviting UNCIRF to visit Gujarat and Orissa to study Muslim/Christian persecution by the respective State Governments run by BJP and ally to play politics unmindful of the reputation of the country? Has the US Congress been informed that when in the so called Christian countries churches are closing down in India churches are annually increasing in number?

Noted anthropologist France Boss has held that “if we wish to take over the direction of a society we must either guide it from within its cultural framework or else eradicate its culture and impose a new culture.” What the BJP is trying to do is to ‘guide India from within its cultural frame work’? America doesn’t have much of a culture, being in fact a “refugee settlement” of sorts! They maynot understand this! But if religious freedom is truly the “civilizing discourse of our time” India will participate in it holding its head high and proclaiming that, WE ARE PROUD OF OUR RECORD!