The Questionable Global
Indices on Freedom, Democracy, etc.
Several international
organizations create ‘international/universal standards’, construct
composite indicators, and then publish ‘World reports’ composed of numerical
ratings. The process to arrive at such ratings is claimed to be “using a
combination of on-the-ground research, consultations with local contacts, and
information from news articles, nongovernmental organizations, governments, and
a variety of other sources” as Freedom House, which publishes the Freedom in
the World Report, which has acceptance as authentic in tracking global trends in
political rights and civil liberties. It publishes an annual ‘Freedom on the
Net’ report featuring a ranked, country-by-country assessment of “online
freedom”!
Those of us who live
in India will be shocked by our country’s rank in their Freedom in the World
Report- it is 161 Out Of 180 Countries
in 2023! Following “initiatives to close the digital divide”
in the nation, India's internet freedom score increased by two points to 51 over the last 4 years!
Those who sponsor the
above onerous job of judging other people are Google, Inc., The Hurford
Foundation, Jyllands-Posten Foundation, Lilly Endowment Inc., the Merrill
Family Foundation, National Endowment for Democracy, and also the US
Government! The NED, for example, has been termed as the US government’s “white
glove” serving US strategic interests! So generally it could be said that all have
been manipulating and directing NGOs around the world to conduct subversion,
infiltration and sabotage, and incite so-called “democratic movements” in
target countries and regions, that is largely, exporting ‘American Values’ as
we know them!
The second important
organization that has taken upon itself the responsibility to study democratic
governments in the world and rank them in accordance with various democracy
indices based on data accessed by it, is The V-Dem Institute (Varieties of
Democracy) an ‘independent’ research institute founded by Professor Staffan I.
Lindberg, a political scientist in the University of Gothenburg, Sweden in 2014.· The ‘Democracy Indices’ by V-Dem is a dataset that
describes the qualities of different governments published by V-Dem Institute. The contributors of funds to the institute
range from the US Government, the Canadian International Development Agency, the World Bank Group, the Open Society
Foundation of the self-proclaimed philanthropist George Soros, the University of
Gothenburg · Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, European Research Council. and Alice
Wallenberg Foundation.
V-DEM Institute
repeatedly denigrates India, and to know its vitriolic prejudice one must
glance at its annual report in 2023 which dreadfully classifies India as an
“electoral autocracy” alongside Hungary and Turkey and ranks it 108, only two
points above Pakistan, describing it further as “one of the worst democracies
in the last 10 years”!. If this is not cant, hypocrisy, and sanctimonious
humbug, what is it? A country that has too many elections, and by-elections to
Assemblies, Local self-government bodies, and the Parliament serially in its 28
states and 9 Union territories that development projects have to be delayed
fearing sanctions from Election Commission, and therefore conducting
Parliamentary and State elections simultaneously is being contemplated, and 2500 political parties participate in these elections and the ruling party at
the Centre has no representation in assemblies and parliament from some of the
states, the country is alleged having “electoral autocracy” because the ruling
party has 303 seats, and the Opposition is unable to get together! Congress
party had ruled this country for 6 decades all by itself and had even declared an Emergency in 1975, extended the Union Government’s term by more than a year
and a half, the Constitutional rights of the people were suspended, the media was
censored, and Opposition politicians were jailed. Rajiv Gandhi of the Congress came
to power after his mother’s tragic death with 411 seats out of 542, in a “sympathy
wave” and ruled as he pleased!
The Chatham House, also
known as ‘The Royal Institute of International Affairs’ which claims to be a
“world-leading policy institute” and “think-tank” (demonstrated this kind of
thinking by inviting recently the most un-thinking person on the planet to
address it on Indian democracy!) is headquartered in London. Its stated mission
is to help governments and societies “build a sustainably secure, prosperous, and just world”.
Their experts on
India warn against getting “fixated” on India’s economic success story, and to
lay stress on the emerging “social tensions” between ‘tradition’ and
‘modernity’. Their scholarship shows the example of the ‘Nirbhaya case’, and Narendra
Modi’s re-election as Chief Minister of Gujarat show-casing “how urban
middle-class opinion is often at odds with the political leadership”. Both
incidents taking place in 2012, leads to the far-fetched observation of a
morbidly prejudiced mind to connect both to ‘social tensions’ due to wealth creation
and expansion of middle class! The Prime Minister of India who led his party to
victory in two elections and has emerged as a world leader is described as “clearly
illiberal (in politics)by most measures.”
Chatham House
scholarship (Dr.Gareth Price) observes that while the Indian constitution is
secular it does not specifically separate church and state in the fashion of
the United States constitution! One has to thank Dr.Price for realizing
however, that neither Indira Gandhi nor her husband were related to Mahatma
Gandhi, though in the next breath, he insinuates that Narendra Modi-led BJP was
elected to power despite India growing “relatively stronger during the
Dr.Manmohan Sing-led UPA rule”, due to “the sense that a more authoritarian
form of government might deliver more, particularly among the urban middle
class”! Under the circumstances, I was not astonished when in April 2022,
Russia designated Chatham House as an "undesirable organization"!
The latest in the
series is the ESG report- a report mandated to be published
by a company or organization about the environmental, social, and governance (ESG)
impacts of their activities. ESG reporting is said to be an invaluable tool
for organizations to track sustainability, identify risks, and report on their
performance. But like the Democracy Report, Freedom on the Net (India
ranked on a scale of 0-100, at 51 Partly Free because during sensitive operations
against terrorists, or in times of inflammable communal situations, the
government chose to jam the Internet!) the Freedom of Press report, etc, this also
is a confounded piece of frame-up giving a Tobacco Company a score of 180 while
Tesla is at 48!
Such nasty reports
and ratings are not merely worthless political innuendos. In the present scheme
of things, they do affect the Sovereign Ratings as the funding agencies of the
erring NGOs often being national Governments directly or their agencies,
international financial institutions, or organizations like the World Bank
Group automatically co-opt these reports and rankings in their data sets and
that would have ramifications across the board in various international bodies
and eventually affect Foreign Investment, Foreign collaborations, joint
ventures, etc. Theoretically, ESG scores allow potential investors to gauge the
company's intentions, and actions, from how they treat their employees to how
the board decisions are made or if environmental issues are being prioritized.
Higher ESG scores are likely to persuade investors to engage, either because
the company's values align with their own or because the company is
sufficiently protected from future risks associated with issues like pollution
or poor governance. Poor ESG scare may turn off the investor’s interest.
Imagine the situation when the ESG scores are faulty!
Some of these ratings
are used to judge a country’s creditworthiness, and suitability to put money into
and operate a business activity from. Sanjeev Sanyal and Aakanksha Arora of the Economic
Advisory Council to the Prime Minister had in a working paper challenged
India's consistent downgrading by top global indices which the duo argued, were
based on a subjective, perception-based methodology. The working paper examines
1) the Freedom in the World Index, 2) Economist Intelligence Unit, and 3) Democracy
Index (V-DEM) indices - happiness, democracy, and freedom- which are inputs into
the World Bank’s World Governance Indicators that, have approximately 18-20 percent weightage in sovereign ratings! The paper notes, "They can’t be
completely ignored and will become even more important in the future as
Environmental, Social, and Governance indices are introduced into global
business/investment decisions." A capital-hungry cannot afford to take
these oblique attacks lying down!
It is worth noting
that during the Covid years, India used its fiscal and monetary resources very
carefully and most of it was directed towards infrastructure building, micro-
and macro-managing the pandemic, with vaccines and othe health inputs, and
bringing in 80 percent of the huge population under food security. The country
went for its own supply chains, technology, and other transformation in opening up
new sectors all in preparation for the post-COVID period.
As a result, India has survived the COVID pandemic with the least damage; the Indian Economy is growing at a faster pace than any other in
the world. We are now the 5th largest economy, and surging forward
to be the 3rd. There is a lot to be happy about for Indians. So to
hell their global indices! AND THREE CHEERS FOR INDIAN DEMOCRACY!